A Level Sociology OCR Practice Exam 2026 – The All-in-One Guide to Exam Success!

A belief concerning the range of 'approved' ideas in social media is that it has a narrow range of ideas. This perspective arises from the observation that social media platforms often prioritize certain content over others, which can create an environment where diverse or dissenting opinions are marginalized. Algorithms that curate content based on user engagement can lead to echo chambers, where users are primarily exposed to viewpoints that reinforce their own beliefs. Consequently, this can limit the variety of ideas that circulate, leading to the perception that there is a restricted range of 'approved' ideas within these digital spaces.

The other options, while relevant discussions in the context of social media, do not embody the belief about the range of ideas as explicitly as this one does. For instance, while some might argue that social media encourages diverse opinions, the reality of algorithm-driven content often contradicts this. Similarly, while social media is sometimes seen as a platform for free speech, it can also impose restrictions based on community guidelines and terms of service, which can further contribute to a narrow range of ideas being visible. Lastly, the promotion of critical thinking is not inherent to social media platforms themselves; rather, it is dependent on the nature of interactions and the content consumed.